Peter Daszak, a member of the World Health Organization (WHO) team investigating the origins of the COVID-19 coronavirus, speaks to media upon arriving with other WHO members to the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan in China's central Hubei province on February 3, 2021. (Photo by Hector RETAMAL / AFP) (Photo by HECTOR RETAMAL/AFP via Getty Images) | COVID WUHAN LAB LEAK

Scientists Who Pushed COVID-19 Natural Origin Narrative, Received Over $50 Million in NIAID Funding From 2020-2021

Scientists who helped cover-up the COVID 19 Wuhan lab leak theory, and push the natural origin narrative received over $50 Million in NIAID funding from 2020 to 2021
January 23, 2022

In an article Published on Epoch times, authored by Jeff Carlson and Hand Mahncke, they document how four prominent scientists who helped cover-up the Wuhan COVID lab leak theory, and in it’s place push the natural origins narrative on the public, were recipients of substantial grants from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases NIAID, under the leadership of Dr. Anthony Fauci; Grants which totaled over $50 Million in funding from 2020-2021.

Leaked e-mails between the scientists and Fauci showed the scientists strongly believed a lab leak of SARS-CoV-2 was the cause for the COVID-19 pandemic. Those concerns were voiced to Fauci during a Teleconference but were ignored. The same day a highly publicized research paper was authored by these scientists, and became the basis for the ‘natural origins’ theory; cited by governments and authorities around the world.

Please note: Full credit for the information in this article goes to Jeff Carlson and Hans Mahncke who authored the original article, which much of this information is copied from. I have simply re-structured the information, edited some of the text and added other info, in order to improve the article.

The Scientists

Three of these scientists who were chief recipients of the grants, were advisors in a teleconference organized by Fauci held on Feb. 1 2020, to address increased public questions regarding the origins of COVID-19; weather they supported a COVID lab leak or natural origins as the source of the pandemic:

Professor, Department of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology Director of Infectious Disease Genomics, Translational Research Institute
Faculty, Graduate Program

Chair, Professor, Department of Immunology and Microbiology Florida Campus, Faculty Graduate Program

Postdoctoral Research, Virology, University of Texas at Austin, PhD, Microbiology, University of Texas at Austin. BS, Life Sciences, minor in Chemistry, Indiana State University

Take a good look at these faces, because these are 3 men who lied about their suspicions regarding a COVID 19 lab leak theory, and profited by covering up what they knew was wrong; actions which put the lives of millions of Americans at risk, as well as billions of people around the world.

Leaked E-Mail Correspondence with Fauci | COVID Lab Leak Cover Up

E-mails obtained under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), present evidence showing the scientists had warned senior members of Fauci’s teleconference that they were 60-80% sure COVID-19 had come out of a lab.

Andersen’s Proximal Origin co-author, Edward Holmes, put the COVID 19 lab leak theory figure even higher, at “80 percent.”

Their concerns were ignored, and on the same day the scientists drafted a research paper titled Proximal Origin, which was highly publicized and cited by governments; it became the basis for the ‘natural origins’ theory, drawing public attention away from the COVID 19 Wuhan lab leak theory.

Note: Andersen and Garry were co-authors of Proximal Origin and Farzan was acknowledged in the Nature version of Proximal Origin for his participatory discussions in the article’s creation.

The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2 | COVID Lab Leak Cover Up

Gary along with Anderson, were also instrumental in a paper published on Nature, Fed 16 2020, titled Proximal Origin, which promoted the ‘natural origins’ theory in place of the lab leak theory which they suspected, for SARS-CoV-2 (the virus which causes COVID-19).

The paper has been frequently cited by government and media; becoming highly influential in pushing the narrative that SARS-CoV-2 had natural origins.

It is also curious that Anderson, with no material experience in researching coronaviruses, was chosen as lead author for the research paper. His stated focus was related to the Zika virus, Ebola virus, West Nile virus, and Lassa virus. It wasn’t until sometime after the Feb. 1 teleconference that he changed his biography to incorporate SARS-CoV-2.

All About Fauci’s NIAID Funding of the ‘Natural Origins’ Theory

Fauci’s NIAID funding to the ‘natural origins’ scientists, who originally suspected a COVID lab leak theory, continued through 2021 with one of the grants on-going until at least 2025. It included a substantial increase in funding to EcoHealth’s Peter Daszak, through whom NIAID had funded controversial gain-of-function coronavirus research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China.

A significant portion of the funding increase for Daszak, as well as for Andersen and Garry, was provided through NIAID’s creation of the Centers for Research in Emerging Infectious Diseases (CREID).

The program, which was originally referred to as Emerging Infectious Diseases Research Centers (EIDRCs) during the early planning stages in 2019, was formally announced under a new name on Aug. 27, 2020. It is not known why the program was initially delayed or why it was renamed.

The new initiative, described as a global network that involves “multidisciplinary investigations into how and where viruses and other pathogens emerge from wildlife and spillover to cause disease in people,” provided eleven new grants totaling $17 million of new funding in the first year and $82 million in total funding across five years.

Peter Daszak Receives $350K NIH Award for Bat Coronavirus Research | COVID Lab Leak Cover-up

Another recipient of funding under the CREID initiative was EcoHealth president Peter Daszak, who received a total of $1.5 million in both 2020 and 2021. Unlike either Andersen or Garry, proceeds from his CREID grant make up the entirety of his listed NIAID grants in both years. By way of comparison, Daszak had received approximately $662,000 in NIAID grant money in 2019. Put another way, Daszak’s post-pandemic funding increased by approximately 130 percent.

Peter Daszak, a member of the World Health Organization (WHO) team investigating the origins of the COVID-19 coronavirus, speaks to media upon arriving with other WHO members to the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan in China's central Hubei province on February 3, 2021. (Photo by Hector RETAMAL / AFP) (Photo by HECTOR RETAMAL/AFP via Getty Images) | COVID LAB LEAK
Peter Daszak, a member of the World Health Organization (WHO) team investigating the origins of the COVID-19 coronavirus, speaks to media upon arriving with other WHO members to the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan in China’s central Hubei province on February 3, 2021. (Photo by Hector RETAMAL / AFP) (Photo by HECTOR RETAMAL/AFP via Getty Images) | COVID WUHAN LAB LEAK

Anderson and Garry Receive $8.9 million 5-year CREID grant | COVID Lab Leak Cover-up

Anderson and Garry were the co-recipients of a new $8.9 million 5-year grant made under the CREID initiative that established the West African Research Network for Infectious Diseases (WARN-ID).

Although the creation of CREID was not publicly announced until Aug. 27, 2020, the Award Notice Date for the grants to Andersen and Garry are listed as May 21, 2020.

Anderson in 2020, receives a whopping $7.4 million in funding | COVID Lab Leak Cover-up

Anderson who as the leaked e-mail correspondence with Fauci showed, stated the virus “looked engineered”; supported the COVID lab leak theory, and was “60 to 70 percent sure the virus came from a laboratory.”, later helped to spearhead Fauci’s ‘natural origins’ narrative, discrediting the lab leak theory.

Anderson received a total of $7.4 million in funding in 2020 as compared to $4.5 million in grant proceeds in 2019. Andersen’s total grant funding increased to nearly $9 million in 2021. The new CREID grants (co-awarded with Garry) accounted for approximately $1.9 million of his 2020 grant proceeds and $2 million of his grant proceeds in 2021. Included in Andersen’s 2021 figure is a $266,250 CREID grant that was made to Andersen but did not include Garry as a co-recipient.

Anderson NIAID Funding and Grants 2020-2021
Anderson NIAID Funding and Grants 2020-2021

Garry Receives $7 Million in NIAID Grants in 2020 | COVID Lab Leak Cover-up

Garry, who told the senior members of Fauci’s teleconference group that he “really can’t think of a plausible natural scenario where you get from the bat virus” to SARS-CoV-2, received $7 million in NIAID grants in 2020 as compared to $5.7 million in 2019. Garry also received $6.6 million in grants in 2021. The new CREID grant (co-awarded with Andersen) accounted for approximately $1.9 million of his 2020 grant proceeds and $1.8 million of his grant proceeds in 2021.

During the Feb. 1, 2020, teleconference, Garry cited the remarkable sequences of mutations that would have to occur for SARS-CoV-2 to arise naturally, telling the group, “I just can’t figure out how this gets accomplished in nature.” However, Garry noted that a lab-created virus would easily explain the virus data he was seeing, telling Fauci’s group that “in the lab, it would be easy to generate the perfect 12 base insert that you wanted.” Clearly he was in support of a COVID lab leak theory, and had evidence to that end, yet he helped to draft the Proximal origins paper, which shaped the public narrative around the source of SARS-CoV-2 to be of natural origins.

nih gov robert garry niaid funding 2020-2021 grants
Robert Garry NIAID Funding and Grants 2020-2021

Notably, Garry recently admitted in written correspondence with The Intercept that he had been advised not to discuss a COVID lab leak in the Proximal Origin paper:

“The major feedback we got from the Feb 1 teleconference was: 1. Don’t try to write a paper at all—it’s unnecessary or 2. If you do write it, don’t mention a lab origin as that will just add fuel to the conspiracists.”

Robert F. Garry in Statement

Peter Daszak Receives $7.5 Million, 5-year CREID Grant | COVID Lab Leak Cover-up

Daszak was the recipient of a new $7.5 million, 5-year CREID grant that established the Emerging Infectious Diseases: South East Asia Research Collaboration Hub (EID-SEARCH). The other participants of the NIAID CREID program can be found here.

Although the creation of CREID was not publicly announced until Aug. 27, 2020, the CREID grant to Daszak denotes an Award Notice Date of June 17, 2020. The timing of Daszak’s grant is particularly noteworthy as it came shortly after President Donald Trump revoked Daszak’s previous grant from Fauci’s NIAID in April 2020 due to Daszak’s entanglements with the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Michael Farzan receives $9.9 million in grants from NIAID | COVID Lab Leak Cover-up

Michael Farzan who also took on an advisory role in the Feb. 1, 2020 teleconference with Fauci, received $9.9 million in grants from Fauci’s NIAID in 2020, followed by another $7.9 million in 2021 and an additional $919,000 at the start of 2022. By comparison, Farzan had received $3.8 million in grant money from NIAID in 2019. Although Farzan received substantial increases in grant funding, none of that money appears to have come under grants provided by the CREID initiative.

Farzan is an immunologist who in 2005 discovered the receptor of the original Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) virus, during the teleconference group with Fauci, told senior members of the group that the COVID-19 pandemic likely originated from a lab, where coronaviruses were passed repeatedly through human-like tissue, accelerating virus mutations, where a mutated virus may have leaked from the lab. Farzan told Fauci’s group that he placed the likelihood of a lCOVID Wuhan lab leak at 60-70 percent.

Michael Farzan NIAID Funding and Grants 2020-2021

However his stance suddenly changed when in an Oct 5, 2021 paper Mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 entry into cells, Farzan’s statements appeared to agree with conclusions put forth in Proximal, of natural origins for SARS-CoV-2:

“comparison of the S protein sequences indicates SARS-CoV-2 may have emerged from the recombination between bat and pangolin coronaviruses.”

Michael Farzan in Paper Mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 entry into cells

Scott Weaver Receives $6.6 Million From NIAID & $3.7M in CREID Grants | COVID Lab Leak Cover-up

Scott Weaver Scientific Director Galveston National Laboratory Portrait
Scott C. Weaver, MS, PhD Scientific Director Galveston National Laboratory

Phone: (409) 266-6500
Mail Route: 0610
Office: Galveston National Laboratory (GNL) 6.200D

Scott weaver, Scientific Director of the Galveston National Laboratory (GNL), who was not part of Fauci’s teleconference group, also saw an increase in funding from Fauci’s NIAID. The GNL was established by NIAID in 2008. Since the start of the pandemic, Weaver has received at least $6.6 million in funding from NIAID, including approx. $1.7 million in CREID grants in 2020 and another $2 million in 2021. By way of comparison, Weaver received $1.35 million in grants from Fauci’s organization in 2019.

Scott Weaver NIAID Funding and Grants 2020-2021

Weaver’s boss, James Le Duc, personally trained staff at the Wuhan Institute of Virology at the Galveston National Laboratory and has collaborated with the Wuhan lab since 1986. Early in the COVID-19 outbreak, on Feb. 9, 2020, Le Duc sent an email to the vice director of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Yuan Zhiming. The email, which contained a document titled “Investigation into the possibility that the nCoV was the result of a release from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (main campus or new BSL3/BSL4 facilities),” expressed his private concerns that the pandemic might have originated as a result of a COVID Wuhan lab leak.

James Le Duc Director Galveston National Laboratory GNL
James Le Duc Director Galveston National Laboratory GNL

Phone: (409) 266-6500
Fax: (409) 266-6810

More on Peter Daszak

Peter Daszak EcoHealth Alliance - Key scientist in the cover up of the COVID Wuhan lab leak and shaping the narrative of SARS-CoV-2 around natural origins
Peter Daszak – EcoHealth Alliance

If you want more info on Daszak and his history of corruption visit

  • Peter Daszak is president of the EcoHealth Alliance
  • He holds a PHD as a zoologist specializing in parasites that attack reptiles. He is not a microbiologist or virologist, he significantly lacks relevant credentials.
  • Daszak repurposed NIH grants from Fauci and his Deputy, Erik Stemmy, and outsourced the gain-of function research to Shi Zeng, a micro-biologist who was head of security at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
  • The experiments he financed were aimed at enhancing Corona virus spike proteins, some found in horseshoe bats that caused the first SARS mini-pandemic, to more easily invade the ACE2 cells in the human lung.
  • He became a writer for Facebook Fact checks
  • Daszak labeled anyone who attributed the pandemic to a lab leak as a “conspiracy theorist.”

Project DEFUSE Proposal to DARPA and Peter Daszak

Peter Daszak was one of the primary authors of a proposal titled Project: DEFUSE for funding, dated March 27, 2018, which was rejected by the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency (DARPA).

In the proposal it details EcoHealth’s plans, in conjunction with the Wuhan Institute, to create entirely new coronaviruses through the synthetic combination of preexisting virus backbones. It describes how those viruses were going to be made more virulent in humans by the insertion of a furin cleavage site, a feature that distinguishes COVID-19 from all other SARS-related coronaviruses.

Daszak, who heavily promoted the natural origins narrative, was personally involved in gain-of-function work with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which continued until at least April 2020. Most prominently, Daszak authored a 2018 research proposal which details the creation of a virus in a lab that bears a remarkable similarity to the defining features of COVID-19:

“We sequenced the spine protein, the protein that attaches to cells, and then you create pseudo particles, insert proteins from the viruses that combined to human cells. Each step of this you move closer and closer to could the virus becomes pathogenic in people! You narrow down the field. You end up with a small number of viruses that really do look like killers.

Peter Daszak

Needless to say, it is greatly disconcerting that one of the primary recipients of NIAID funding under Fauci’s leadership, was personally involved in a proposal to DARPA for funding gain of function research. This is in stark contrast to Fauci’s claim that the NIH never funded gain of function research. Here is an explanation of NIH vs NIAID if your confused.

Fauci Spars With Sen. Rand Paul Over Origins Of Covid-19

More on Francis Collins

In 2017, the NIH under Collins’ leadership ended a three-year moratorium on gain-of-function research, which aimed to make “pathogens more potent or likely to spread in people.”

“More than 3 years after imposing a moratorium on U.S. funding for certain studies with dangerous viruses, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in Bethesda, Maryland, today lifted this so-called ‘pause’ and announced a new plan for reviewing such research…Such studies could help experts prepare for pandemics, but pose risks if the souped-up pathogen escapes the lab,” report
Francis Collins Ex NIH Director involved in gain of function research that very likely lead to the COVID Wuhan lab leak
Francis Collins Ex NIH Director

Francis S. Collins
Director NIH (ex)
Building 1 – Room 126
Duty station Bethesda MD 20892
Phone: 301.496.2433
E-mail: Francis.Collins@nih.hhs.go

Francis Collins stepped down from the NIH shortly after Richard Ebright of Rutgers University accused Collins of making false public statements about National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) grants to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), which have since been proven to fund the study of “chimeric SARS-related coronaviruses” which “could infect human cells.” This lead some to allege Collins stepped down from the NIH, as a result of the exposure of his participation in gain of function research.

Bill Gates, Francis Collins, and Anthony Fauci at an NIH for Global Health Meeting in 2016
Bill Gates, Francis Collins, and Anthony Fauci at an NIH for Global Health Meeting in 2016

Francis Collins Admits Funding Wuhan Lab

Speaking to the veteran radio host, Dr. Collins admitted about U.S. collaboration with the Wuhan lab:

“Well, we, when we give a grant, Hugh, it has terms attached to it of what it is that the grantee is supposed to be doing with those funds. And we require annual reports to see whether that in fact is what they have been doing. And we trust the grantee to be honest and not deceptive. The grant funds that went to Wuhan, which were a subcontract from Eco Health, were very specifically aimed to try to categorize viruses that they could isolate from bats in Chinese caves, which we had a good reason to want to know more about, given SARS and MERS that had come out of there. And so we basically had those criteria attached to the grant. And of course, the amount of money that we were providing to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, I’m sure, was a tiny fraction of their total funding. And we had no control over what else they were doing with those funds. That’s another thing we’d like to know more about, and an investigation might potentially tell us.”

Dr. Collins in interview with veteran radio host

Collins also stated the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is involved in the Wuhan lab, but downplayed their influence in operations at the lab.

In truth – as The National Pulse has revealed – the lab hosts communist study sessions in order to boost “party spirit” and fealty to the Chinese Communist Party.

Ironically in another reply to a question about the NIH funding humans rights abusers and tyrannies he called the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) he admitted “there are certainly connections” with the Chinese Communist Party:

“I think you’re demonizing the Wuhan Institute of Virology as it is pure and simple an instrument of the Chinese Communist Party. There are certainly connections there, but let’s be clear. There are scientists working in that institute who are amongst the best in the world in terms of understanding virology. And many of those folks have had long-term relationships with others in other countries, including the United States, with a lot of respect, a lot of shared information. I don’t think we should just basically say well, because they’re in that country, they’re evil. I think you’re going too far with that one.”

Dr. Collins in interview with veteran radio host

Francis Collins Asks Fauci To Do A “Devastating Published Take Down” of The Great Barrington Declaration (GBD)

A new release of emails obtained through the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) shows the outgoing NIH Director Francis Collins also asking Anthony Fauci to carry out a “quick and devastating published takedown” of the Great Barrington Declaration (GBD).

The “three fringe epidemiologists” as Dr. Collins put it, happen to be some of the most published and esteemed doctors in their perspective fields:

  1. Dr. Martin Kulldorf, a biostatistician, infectious disease expert, and professor of medicine of Harvard University.
  2. Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, a public health policy expert, physician, health economist, and a professor of medicine at Stanford University.
  3. Dr. Sunetra Gupta, an expert in immunology, mathematical modeling of infectious diseases, and a professor at Oxford University.

The Great Barrington Declaration established on Oct 2020 advocated for protecting those most at risk, and focusing on expediting herd immunity. The reality is mandates and lockdowns can delay the spread of COVID-19, but can’t indefinitely prevent it, it’s only a matter of time before everyone is infected.

The three experts also highlighted the impact of draconian lockdown policies on mental and physical health including: worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings, increases in suicides, and deteriorating mental health – leading in the future to increased mortality, poverty, and loss of human rights, with children facing the brunt of the repercussions.

Let’s not even mention the devastation on many countries economies, with massive debt piling up, leading to unprecedented inflation and rises in interest rates…

Both Dr. Martin Kulldorff and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya reponded to the FOIA released e-mails in a professional manner, calling again for an open debate on the matter:

Dr. Martin Kulldorff response:

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya Response:

As of Jan 2022 the GBD has nearly 1 Million signatories, of which approximately 60,500 are medical practitioners and public health scientists from across the world. So over 80,000 scientists put their reputation and careers on the line, yet it’s a “fringe” belief? Come on Mr. Collins, your simply making a fool of yourself at this point.

Conclusion: Did Millions in Potential Grants Shape the Scientists Bias in pushing the ‘natural origin’ theory?

Both Farzan and Garry had noted the difficulties of arguing for the ‘natural origin theory’ due to the presence of a furin cleavage site in the COVID-19 virus, during the conference call and through their notes from the call—which were submitted to Fauci, NIH head Francis Collins, and Wellcome Trust head Jeremy Farrar.

The furin cleavage site is the defining feature that gives COVID-19 the ability to easily infect humans and has long been puzzled over by scientists, since no such site has ever been observed in naturally occurring SARS-related coronaviruses.

Jeremy Farrar

Jeremy Farrar is a clinical scientist and Director of Wellcome the world’s second largest foundation dedicated to science and health.

Dr. Francis Collins

Francis Collins is a physician-geneticist who took office as NIH director on Aug 17 2009 a position he retired Dec 19, 2021

These are two very esteemed doctors, ex-director of the NIH Francis Collins, and Wellcome trust Director Jeremy Farrar, who despite their long list of credentials, ignored or rejected e-mails from Farzan and Garry, who clearly stated all the evidence suggests SARS-CoV-2 was engineered, and that they believed the virus very likely leaked from a lab such as Wuhan, where the gain of function research had been preformed. They themselves had suspicions of an engineered virus, as did Dr. James Le Duc, which he expressed in his e-mail to the WIV director. Yet these individuals helped to cover up the lab leak theory, and instead push the natural origins theory in the face of contrary evidence.

Although members of Fauci’s group later claimed that they gradually changed their views on the virus’s origin over the course of a month, on Feb 3, 2020, just two days after Garry and Farzan indicated their belief in a lab leak, Fauci attended a meeting at the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. During this meeting, which included a presentation by Fauci, and was also attended by Daszak and Andersen, Fauci and his group promoted the natural origin theory to the Academy, despite having just been told on the teleconference and in subsequent emails that a lab leak provided the most likely explanation for the virus.

Despite what Fauci or his untruthful cohorts may say…I think the evidence laid out in this article shows that these scientists had a clear financial conflicts of interest; allowing greed to corrupt their morals and ethics. They put profit before the well being of humanity, and published Proximal Origin which became the foundation for the ‘natural origins’ narrative, which that they knew was wrong.

I think Jeff Carlson and Hans Mahncke who wrote this original article said it best:

“How is it that among the thousands of scientists eligible to participate in the much-desired funding from the eleven grants provided by Fauci’s new $82 million CREID initiative, three of those chosen happened to be the same individuals who had led the way in promoting Fauci’s natural origins narrative—despite their private concerns that the virus had been created in a lab.”

Jeff Carlson and Hans Mahncke

Listen folks…Fauci lied under oath, these scientists helped to cover it up, and the cost of their lies put billions at risk…Perhaps the pandemic could have been handled differently, had the truth been published instead of lies. It really begs the question – they got caught this time – but how much did they get away with in the past by propagating lies and deceiving the public? This is just a glimpse into corruption that has always been there; a rot, which slowly eats away at the very foundations of society: endangering lives, undermining democracy and creating a world in which so many suffer needlessly, because the unethical actions of a select few in positions of power.

One comment

  1. Rachael Mitchell -

    It’s criminal what they all have done, just to fatten their pockets. Not only have they done crimes against humanity but they’ve also sinned against God. God help them to repent of their deeds because the alternative is not a good one. Thank you for continuing to expose the corruption.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

More Readings

Detection of microplastics in human lung tissue using μFTIR spectroscopy graphical abstract high res

Study finds microplastics in living lung tissue, mainly polyethylene and polyethylene, the main materials in n95 and surgical COVID face masks

Scientists Find Microplastics in Living Human Lung Tissue – The Potential Long Term Health Risks of Long Term Face Mask Use During the COVID 19 Pandemic – n95 and surgical masks
April 19, 2022
Official government of Canada data statcan Alberta and BC excess deaths in 0 to 44 year olds as of dec 2021

Official data from the Government of Canada Shows Over 70% of Excess Deaths are in Ages 0-44, the lowest risk demographic for COVID 19 death.

Official Government of Canada Data Shows Over 70% of Excess Deaths are in Ages 0-44
April 15, 2022
World Health Organization WHO Pandemic Treaty 2022

World Health Organization – WHO Global Accord on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response aims at global control of pandemic emergencies.

World Health Organization’s Pandemic Treaty – WHO Global Accord on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response
April 12, 2022
Moderna Industrial Engineer Whistleblower on 4Chan Post Screen Clip

Moderna Whistleblower exposes secret ingredients added to COVID 19 Vaccines which can effect fertility and sex characteristics in offspring.

Moderna Whistleblower – Industrial Engineer, Posts Anonymous Article Revealing Secret Ingredients Added to COVID 19 Vaccines
April 12, 2022
COVID 19 Vaccines inhibit DNA repair and can be reverse transcribed into human DNA

Two studies which show the COVID-19 spike protein which is also encoded in the mRNA of COVID-19 vaccines, impairs DNA repair, and can be reverse transcribed into human DNA.

COVID-19 Spike Protein Impairs DNA Repair and Can Be Reverse Transcribed into Human DNA According to Two Studies
April 7, 2022
Facebook Whistleblowers LEAK DOCS Detailing Effort to Secretly Censor Vax Concerns on Global Scale

Facebook Insiders LEAK documents detailing efforts to secretly censor COVID-19 vaccine injuries and scientific dissent on a Global Scale.

Facebook Whistleblowers Leak Documents Detailing Effort to Secretly Censor Vax Concerns on a Global Scale
April 1, 2022